<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing: the new language of story &#187; anti-hero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somenewlanguage.net/tag/anti-hero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somenewlanguage.net</link>
	<description>Eric Staggs: Copywriter, Screenwriter, Fiction and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Researching the Anti-hero in popular culture</title>
		<link>http://somenewlanguage.net/2009/02/21/researching-the-anti-hero-in-popular-culture/</link>
		<comments>http://somenewlanguage.net/2009/02/21/researching-the-anti-hero-in-popular-culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[characters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-hero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop-culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somenewlanguage.net/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-hero’s acceptance into mainstream media is a relatively recent happening. Within the past ten years, it seems that we’re saturated with anti-heroes; comics, books, television, video games. The white armored knight is cliché to the jaded Gen-Xers, and down right hokey to me-centric Millenials. Maybe the Millenials can easier identify with a character that takes what he wants, and doesn’t have to go through the hoops to get it. It’s closer to their instant gratification culture. Easier to identify with, perhaps, than the stodgy moralist heroes like Captain America. Regardless of the cultural consequences of a generation raised on Grand Theft Auto, the Punisher and Hellboy, anti-heroes are in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span>The anti-hero’s acceptance into mainstream media is a relatively recent happening. Within the past ten years, it seems that we’re saturated with anti-heroes; comics, books, television, video games. The white armored knight is cliché to the jaded Gen-Xers, and down right hokey to me-centric Millenials. Maybe the Millenials can easier identify with a character that takes what he wants, and doesn’t have to go through the hoops to get it. It’s closer to their instant gratification culture. Easier to identify with, perhaps, than the stodgy moralist heroes like Captain </span><span>America</span><span>. Regardless of the cultural consequences of a generation raised on Grand Theft Auto, the Punisher and Hellboy, anti-heroes are in.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span><span style="font-family: Arial;">The Top Ten Anti-Heroes</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span><span style="font-family: Arial;">10. Hellboy (Hellboy I and II)<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Seems like this would be a no brainer; the dude is a demon. But he was raised by a wise old man who tried to impart upon him the virtues of being human. I don’t know if it worked, but so far Hellboy hasn’t destroyed the world. He’s a character with a conscience, but an ever lasting teenagers dis-respect of authority. Frankly, he’s a rather mild demon, throwing tantrums and the like when he doesn’t agree with his curfew. It is solely the character’s origins and his perceived destiny that make him an anti-hero. Without that demonic starting point, he might just be a loose-cannon cop movie.</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span><span style="font-family: Arial;">9. Riddick (Pitch Black / Chronicles of Riddick)<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;"><span>The two Riddick films were excellent science-fiction. By no means were they Academy Award winners, both were thought provoking and well cast. The character of Riddick is the quintessential anti-hero. His origins are shrouded in mystery, stalked by the law and the unlawful, he is both prey and hunter, a perfect and simultaneous juxtaposition of dueling realties. He proves he has feelings, but has no qualms about killing. A close viewer will see that it becomes <em>almost </em></span>an act of pleasure. If not pleasure, then perhaps satisfaction. That’s about as anti-hero as it gets.</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>8. Corwin of Amber (Chronicles of Amber by Roger Zelazny)<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Corwin, one of the Nine Princes in Amber, hails from a family of anti-heroes and outright villains. Pitted in a fatal competition against his siblings, Corwin raises an army from across dimensions to march on his family’s/brother’s castle. But Corwin remains frosty through out the endeavor. Even when his brother puts out his eyes and throws him in the dungeon, Corwin, more or less, stays composed. His love’em and leave’em attitude, his daring-do and cut-throat swordsmanship reserve his place in the Top Ten of Bad Good Guys (or is it Good Bad Guys?) forever.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>7. Wolverine<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Old snarl butt himself. I&#8217;ve been reading X-men comics since I was 11 (which was a long time ago). I think Wolverine is the only character who&#8217;s gotten more interesting as time progresses. Of course, he was basically an empty canvass. Introducing generic &#8220;bad asses&#8221; with amnesia is pretty heavy handed. But I think the writers did okay with it. I mean, he didn&#8217;t end up a lost prince or king of the vampires did he? Anyway, Wolverine is a cold-blooded killer with a heart of gold. He&#8217;s a perfect, if predictable and somewhat unsophisticated anti-hero. The dichotomy of his personality, the need for efficiency in his function, a sadistic bit of savagery and the idea that he is still a feeling human, make his a pretty classic anti-hero.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>6. Bobba Fett<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Yes, I know he&#8217;s got cool Mandalorian armor. I know he&#8217;s got a jet pack, missiles and disintegration ray. But he&#8217;s also a bounty hunter; that is, he&#8217;s a fighter-type who hunts other sentients for money, regardless of their innocence or guilt. Sure, he does good when he gets the bad guys. But how does that weight against all the innocents he&#8217;s accidentally or intentionally disintegrated? He&#8217;s a clone of few words, but if we can believe Lucas&#8217; expanded universe, and prequels, he&#8217;s the direct clone of the last of the Mandalorian warriors&#8230; which makes me wonder why the rest of the clone army doesn&#8217;t shoot better. Bob, as he&#8217;s known to his friends, later reaches an uneasy truce with Han Solor, as years of Coyote and Roadrunner antics. Bob is a great example of a bad guy being co-opted by public opinion, and being written in to fill the role he&#8217;s expected to have. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>5. Blade </strong><br />
He is a vampire, after all. I mean, half vampire. His heart is in the right place. You know, stalk the night, jack the leeches, send them flying, bursting into hot cinders and ashes, flinging stakes and blasting shotgun shells filled with&#8230;whatever the hell he puts in them. For all his grim determination and brutal efficiency, he&#8217;s sorta got a heart of gold, or at least a soft spot for strays. Perhaps it&#8217;s that so many anti-heroes see themselves, or at least, how they could or should have been in the disaffected and disenfranchised. I know when ever I&#8217;m plotting major pseudo-villainy, I always feel a pang of sympathy for the victims of my plots, almost as if I could see it from their point of view&#8230;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>4. Batman<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Everyone&#8217;s favorite ego-maniacal pseudo-sociopath! Yes, the Batman is a true anti-hero. But I&#8217;m afraid his high-prioced rough and tumble antics are wearing a little thin these days. The last installment of Batman&#8217;s legend was a great flick, no doubt. But here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; putting &#8220;Xxtreme&#8221; in front of the Joker doesn&#8217;t really make for a better story. Don&#8217;t get me wrong. The last Batman movie was spectacular, well played, posted, and cut. But I was watching Xxtreme Joker more than I was watching Batman. The hero has actually in this case become too &#8220;anti.&#8221; Batman&#8217;s need to dispense justice is now totally overshadowed by his lunacy. Nevertheless, he&#8217;s a classic anti-hero will will likely never escape any listing &#8220;chaotic good&#8221; characters.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>3. Alex (A Clockwork Orange)<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">His favorite pastimes are assault, rape and thievery. He certainly sounds like a villain. But in the novel A Clockwork Orange, Alex is “our humble narrator.” His apparent inability to tell right from wrong seems to stem from a sociopathic view regarding other humans as not-quite living things. I’m not making much of a case for the hero aspect am I? Well, in this context he’s our only point of reference for the world. While he seems atypical to us, he does have droogs who are more of less, just like him. Perhaps, in fact, he’s not an anti-hero, but more appropriately, just the main character…</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. <strong>Dexter</strong> comes in at a strong #2 on the top ten anti-hero list. I mean, he is a serial killer. It’s just that he kills the bad guys. His methods are gruesomely effective, his habit are typically fastidious and he’s desperately clever. He’d be a great hero, except that, you know, he chops people up. Nevertheless, for a sociopath, he manages to balance a job, family life and relationships reasonable well. For someone who is off and on again hunted by the FBI, he manages to “take care of business.” It’s Dexter’s ethical code that keeps him in our hearts as a merely misunderstood vigilante. He uses his code to curb, control, alleviate and justify his behavior. And from an absolute justice point of view, he’s absolutely correct. But then again, he’s using his code as a shield, a catch-all excuse that allows him to indulge in his more base behaviors. He is, after all, a serial killer.  </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span>1. <strong>Achilles </strong>– “Sing oh Muse, of the mighty Achilles, whose wrath laid low so many great and noble heroes…” For my money, Achilles of Homer’s Iliad is the number one anti-hero of all time. Indestructible, or at least, invulnerable, unparalleled martial prowess and an ego to match, Achilles temper and self-centric world view cost the lives of many Greeks. Achilles fights for the Greeks, the invaders, looking to take troy by force of arms. The excuse for the conflict, Agamemnon’s wife Helen, is ostensibly justifiable. She was, according to their cultural tradition, the wife/property of Greek king, and </span><span>Paris</span><span> had no rights, legal recourse, or authority to take her, gods or no. Hector, the best of all Greek men, fought on the side of the Wrong. It is precisely because he had conscious knowledge of that fact, that he was the perfect man. He was honor bound to defend his family, his home and his people. When Achilles defeated Hector and his rage drove him to drag Hector’s corpse around, we see clearly what sort of monster we’re dealing with.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somenewlanguage.net/2009/02/21/researching-the-anti-hero-in-popular-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Hero</title>
		<link>http://somenewlanguage.net/2008/12/03/anti-hero/</link>
		<comments>http://somenewlanguage.net/2008/12/03/anti-hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-hero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[characters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somenewlanguage.net/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s no end to the books and guides, manuals even, written about writing. Set to that body of work with a ginsu knife and you can carve out probably a dozen or more sub-categories of study within the world of writing. I know my shelves are lined with books about writing. One topic that’s never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span>There’s no end to the books and guides, manuals even, written about writing. Set to that body of work with a ginsu knife and you can carve out probably a dozen or more sub-categories of study within the world of writing.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I know my shelves are lined with books about writing. One topic that’s never well enough addresses for me is the Hero / Anti-Hero. Popular media is rampant with bad-ass tough guys with that one redeeming quality. Are these dudes pinnacle examples of the literary craft? Probably not. But they draw us in, make us what to know more.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>A good character can pull even the worst plot through the muck and get it on its feet again. In Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, we follow Indy on another exciting, but somewhat predictable whirl wind adventure. In fact, by the tank chase through the desert, we’d seen all the tricks the filmmakers had available – but we *love* Indy, so we watched him battle his way through another legion of very Stormtrooper-esque Nazis.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>A good character should never be confused with a Good Character. Luke Skywalker is a good character. Bobba Fett, with only three damn lines, is a <em>Good</em> Character. So what makes ‘em good vs. Good? Well, the best characters have a bit of the baddies in them.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The Anti-Hero, grim faced and of questionable morality, but stern ethics, is a literary entity that I think the average reader can more readily identify with. I mean, even on our best days, sometimes we call in sick to work, lie about eating the last cookie, or slip a stop-light.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I don’t see the “hero” archetype ever living up to its expectations in a realistic setting, so perhaps there is actually only the Anti-Hero?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Consider Hector from the Illiad. This dude was considered by his contemporaries and the listeners of the tale for centuries to follow, as the pinnacle of the ancient Greek arête. The best man. He defended his home, family and whiney brother with his life. Hector <em>knew</em> that Paris was an adulterer, had absconded with a king’s wife and brought an incredible doom to Troy, but he defended him anyway. He’s a hero for his defense of King and Country, but a bit of an “anti” for intentionally choosing the wrong side.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Maybe this isn’t the best example of an anti-hero. How about Dirty Harry? A loose-cannon cop with a bad attitude and “the biggest handgun made by man.” He’s a police officer, ostensibly out to do good, out to keep the streets safe for Little Janey and Little League Pete. At the same time, he’s as destructive as a force of nature and a fearless gun fighter who’s put more than a few baddies six feet under. A good guy we want to fear. James Bond, essentially an SAS thug with expensive tastes. He’s saving the world, no doubt. But he’s also been licensed by MI6 to kill at his discretion.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>What’s the difference between a Hero’s Fatal Flaw, and an Anti-Hero’s Redeeming Quality? Well, staying with the Anti-Hero, it’s usually something “cool,” something we admire. The Wolverine from Marvel comics is a perfect example. He’s on the good guy’s team, but he’s not really very good. In fact, he’s a cigar smoking, beer swilling brawler, who’d just as soon knife ya as look at ya. Corwin, from Roger Zelazny’s Amber Chronicles is another great example. He’s charming and suave, yet cold hearted enough to lead an entire shadow population to their deaths ascending Mount Kolvir, his justification being quite simple: they are from a Shadow World, Amber is the only one true City.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>In more contemporary media, I suppose Anakin Skywalker could be considered an Anti-hero. He’s a Jedi, but treads dangerously close to the Dark Side, forever tempting powers he simply cannot understand. But here’s the failure in the character: he’s got nothing we want. He’s emotionally unbalanced, suffering from an unrelenting Oedipal complex and constant badgering from his foster-family (the Jedi Order). He’s a killer. He’s a powerful force user. But… he’s lacking that something special. It’s as if he was designed to be an anti-hero, but can’t fulfill the “cool” part. He lacks that suave, debonair charm. Sure, he wears black and has a bad boy attitude, but ultimately, he chooses to murder the Jedi Order’s young students. Perhaps he’s more of a Fallen Hero, or dare I say it, never even achieved that Hero status?</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somenewlanguage.net/2008/12/03/anti-hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
